Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingof narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine
- Autores: Oleg Reznik, Maksym Pochtovyi, Kateryna Yanishevska, Andrii Butyrskyi
- Localización: Revista Amazonia Investiga, ISSN-e 2322-6307, Vol. 10, Nº. 39, 2021, págs. 159-168
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
-
Resumen
The object of the study is social relations regarding the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs or precursors. It has been found that there are scholars who choose different definitions for interpreting the nature of the proof, but are unanimous about the role of this process in proving a person’s guilt and choosing an adequate punishment.
The authors use a set of scientific methods of modern epistemology as well as comparative, special legal, logical and other methods.
We propose to analyze all the circumstances that are subject to proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smuggling of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors. In this paper must identify the general grounds that must be proved in each crime and the specific circumstances that are important to prove only in the case of smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors.
The conclusion is made about the importance of proper procedural support of criminal prosecution of persons who have committed a crime under Article 305 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Therefore, we propose to include in the subject of evidence for the prejudicial inquiry.
