Beyond populism studies

Benjamin De Cleen ^[1] ; Jason Glynos ^[2]
1. [1] Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  
  Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  
  Arrondissement Brussel-Hoofdstad, Bélgica
2. [2] University of Essex
  
  University of Essex
  
  Colchester District, Reino Unido
Localización: Journal of language and politics, ISSN 1569-2159, Vol. 20, Nº. 1, 2021, págs. 178-195
Idioma: inglés
Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)

Resumen
- ‘Populism’ has become ever more ubiquitous in political analysis, to the extent that ‘populism studies’ appears on course to establishing itself as a field of research in its own right. This article warns about the dangers of such a development. Taking a discourse theoretical approach as our starting point – but also critically engaging with this tradition’s contribution to the hype about populism – we suggest that ‘populism studies’ (and the preoccupation with populism this field embodies) risks reifying populism by focusing on populism as a phenomenon ‘as such’, and through an over-reliance on the concept of populism to approach that phenomenon. This, we argue, hampers a nuanced and contextualized understanding of the exact role populism plays in different populist politics. This is not a call for abandoning the concept of populism altogether, but a call for de-centring the concept and for moving beyond academia’s ‘populist moment’.