Is lung resection appropriate for late octogenarians? Surgical outcomes of patients aged≥80 years with lung cancer
-
Y. Iijima [1] ; S. Iwai [1] ; A. Yamagata [1] ; N. Motono [1] ; K. Usuda [1] ; S. Yamagishi [2] ; K. Koizumi [2] ; H. Uramoto [1]
-
[1] Kanazawa Medical University
Kanazawa Medical University
Japón
-
[2] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aidu Chuo Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
-
- Localización: Clinical & translational oncology, ISSN 1699-048X, Vol. 23, Nº. 8, 2021, págs. 1585-1592
- Idioma: inglés
- Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
-
Resumen
Purpose This study aimed to determine the outcomes and prognostic factors associated with octogenarians who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer.
Methods/patients From 2009 to 2018, 76 octogenarians underwent pulmonary surgery for lung cancer at the Kanazawa Medical University, Japan. They were divided into two groups (early and late octogenarians), and their clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were investigated. Overall survival rates and recurrence-free survival rates were determined using Kaplan–Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.
Results Limited surgery was performed more often in the late octogenarian group; however, most perioperative factors were not signifcantly diferent between the two groups. The 3-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 61.2% and 52.8%, respectively. The median observation period was 37.5 (8.9–112.3) months postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that age≥85 years (late octogenarian), smoking history, and squamous cell carcinoma on histology were associated with worse survival rates. Multivariate analysis identifed age≥85 years (late octogenarian) (p=0.011) and cigarette smoking (p=0.025) as unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival, respectively.
Conclusions Most octogenarians with an indication for surgery can tolerate pulmonary surgery. However, owing to the limitations of this retrospective, single-center study, future studies involving multiple-institutions are required to confrm our fndings.
