La lectura de los planes de urbanismo de Montevideo, Buenos Aires, Lima, Santiago de Chile y Quito, nos brinda la oportunidad de reflexionar sobre su relación con los conflictos sociales que surgen para reivindicar los bienes urbanos mínimos (vivienda, equipamiento, empleo, transporte, etc.). La carencia de medios instrumentales idóneos para intervenir las problemáticas pendientes y el divorcio con los procesos socioeconómicos que interactúan en el territorio, en no pocas ocasiones, acentúan la gravedad de estos conflictos sociales.
Here a close scrutiny of the overall planning schemes drawn up for the cities of Montivideo, Buenos Aires, Lima, Santiago de Chile and Quito leads the author to consider the degree to which these could be said to answer those social conflicts arising from a need for housing, social services, work, transport, etc., of these places. The complete lack of any adequate channels of approach to the resolving of these outstanding demands and the total divorce as between such plans and the reigning socio-economic reality that has such cities in its grip makes them the source of greater and not lesser social unrest on many occasions.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados