Neural Drive is Greater for a High-Intensity Contraction Than for Moderate-Intensity Contractions Performed to Fatigue

• Jonathan D. Miller ^[1] ; Jeremy D. Lippman ^[1] ; Michael A. Trevino ^[2] ; Trent J. Herda ^[1]
  1. [1] University of Kansas

     University of Kansas

     City of Lawrence, Estados Unidos

     
  2. [2] Oklahoma State University

     Oklahoma State University

     Estados Unidos

     
• Localización: Journal of strength and conditioning research: the research journal of the NSCA, ISSN 1064-8011, Vol. 34, Nº. 11, 2020, págs. 3013-3021
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • The purpose of this study was to investigate whether moderate-intensity contractions performed to fatigue activate the motor unit (MU) pool to the same extent as a higher-intensity contraction. Subjects (7 men, 2 women, age = 22.78 +/- 4.15 years, height = 173.78 +/- 14.19 cm, mass = 87.39 +/- 21.19 kg) performed 3 isometric maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs), an isometric trapezoidal contraction at 90% MVC (REP90), and repetitive isometric trapezoidal contractions at 50% MVC performed to failure with the first (REP1) and final repetition (REPL) used for analysis. Surface EMG was recorded from the vastus lateralis. Action potentials were extracted into firing events of single MUs with recruitment thresholds (RTs), MU action potential amplitudes (MUAPAMP), and mean firing rates (MFRs) recorded. Linear MFR and MUAPAMP vs. RT and exponential MFR vs. MUAPAMP relationships were calculated for each subject. The level of significance was set at p <= 0.05. B terms for the MFR vs. MUAPAMP relationships (p = 0.001, REPL = -4.77 +/- 1.82 pps[middle dot]mV-1, REP90 = -2.63 +/- 1.00 pps[middle dot]mV-1) and predicted MFRs for MUs recruited at 40% MVC (p < 0.001, REPL = 11.14 +/- 3.48 pps, REP90 = 18.38 +/- 2.60 pps) were greater for REP90 than REPL indicating firing rates were greater during REP90. In addition, larger mean (p = 0.038, REPL = 0.178 +/- 0.0668 mV, REP90 = 0.263 +/- 0.128 mV) and maximum (p = 0.008, REPL = 0.320 +/- 0.127 mV, Rep90 = 0.520 +/- 0.234 mV) MUAPAMPS were recorded during REP90 than REPL. Larger MUs were recruited and similar sized MUs maintained greater firing rates during a high-intensity contraction in comparison to a moderate-intensity contraction performed at fatigue. Individuals seeking maximized activation of the MU pool should use high-intensity resistance training paradigms rather than moderate-intensity to fatigue.