A new narrative has gradually been evolving, a narrative shared by constitutional literature, which focuses on the concept of constitutional change. As opposed to the less attractive technical terms “revision” and “amendment,” change corresponds to images of transformation through the perpetual interaction of formal and informal mechanisms, and suggests fl uidity encompassing the correlation between political antagonism, judicial identity and the constitution. Amending procedures dictate how constitutional change is supposed to take place, and the success or failure in the accomplishment of their intended diffi culty level affects the relationship between explicit and implicit changes. Still, the reality of change is determined through the impact of other factors as well, such as the structure of the political system, the effect of civil or common law tradition, the system of judicial review, and constitutional ethos
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados