Remontándose a Sócrates y el ágora, Hannah Arendt, piensa que ahí estuvo la primera democracia. En Las Leyes, Platón limitó la política a las élites filosóficas y negó democracia y persuasión. Sin voluntad expresa de unir el gusto con la política y democracia, Kant en su tercera crítica retoma el juicio reflexionante o del gusto y cree que por su veracidad, espontaneidad y por su búsqueda de comunidad, basada en el gusto, es clave para la política: si uniéramos el sentimiento y la percepción en el juicio del gusto, aceptaríamos que tiene facetas que sirven a la filosofía política.
Going back to Socrates and the agora, Hannah Arendt thinks the first democracy was there. Thirty years after Pericles, Socrates was killed. In Laws, Plato limited politics to philosophical elites and denied democracy and persuasion. Without an expressed willingness to unite taste with politics and democracy, Kant resumes, in his third critique, the reflective judgment (or judgment of taste) and believes that because of its truth and spontaneity and due to its taste-based search for community, it is the key to politics: if we joined feeling and perception in the judgment of taste, we would accept that it has facets that serve political philosophy. Ricœur disagrees with the conception of politics as an endless idea, although he praises the exemplary nature of the aesthetic experience that manifests itself in the judgment of taste. For Lyotard such judgment is the "as if" that universalizes taste (which he calls enthusiasm).
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados