Trade-offs between the natural environment and recreational infrastructure: A case study about peatlands under different management scenarios

• Martino, Simone ^[1] ; Kenter, Jasper O. ^[1] ; Albers, Nora ^[1] ; Whittingham, Mark J. ^[2] ; Young, Dylan M. ^[3] ; Pearce-Higgins, James W. ^[4] ; Martin-Ortega, Julia ^[3] ; Glenk, Klaus ^[5] ; Reed, Mark S. ^[6]
  1. [1] University of York

     University of York

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] Newcastle University

     Newcastle University

     Reino Unido

     
  3. [3] University of Leeds

     University of Leeds

     Reino Unido

     
  4. [4] British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK
  5. [5] Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Road, Kings Buildings, Peter Wilson Building, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
  6. [6] Thriving Natural Capital Challenge Centre, Department of Rural Economy, Environment & Society, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Peter Wilson Building, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 123, 2022
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • The importance of peatlands for conservation and provision of public services has been well evidenced in the last years, especially in relation to their contribution to the net zero carbon emission agenda. However, little is known about the importance of recreation relative to conservation and their trade-offs. In this paper we address this knowledge gap by exploring the trade-offs between natural properties of peatlands and recreational infrastructures for different categories of recreationists (walkers, cyclists, anglers, and birdwatchers) of an open heather moors and peatlands landscape. We do so building on a series of management scenarios formulated through participatory methods and applying choice experiment related to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and UNESCO Global Geopark in the UK. Results show a high degree of heterogeneity in landscape preferences across different user groups. Recreationists had a higher appreciation for semi-natural habitats compared to pristine or restored peatland (e.g., land rewetting). Walkers and cyclists were more sensitive to changes in the availability of recreational facilities than to environmental quality, while anglers’ and birdwatchers’ preferences were more aligned with values promoted by restoration policies. Overall, our results point to a potential value conflict between benefits generated by conservation and the benefits valued most by some groups of recreationists. To maximise success conflicts like the one revealed here need to be considered in strategies that provide a central role for peatlands in net zero climate mitigation strategies.