Un lulista responde a Paolo Flores d’Arcais

• Autores: Esteve Jaulent
• Localización: Knowledge, contemplation and Lullism: contributions to the Lullian session at the SIEPM congress - Freising, August 20-25, 2012 / coord. por José Higuera Rubio, 2015, ISBN 978-2-503-54853-1, págs. 191-205
• Idioma: español
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • I propose an analysis of Paolo Flores d’Arcais’ work Atheism and Truth in the light of Ramon Llull’s thought. This task shows Ramon Llull as a prevailing philosopher, who can help solve many of the difficulties of the twenty-first-century thought. Paolo Flores d‘Arcais departs from a “philosophy of disenchantment” that depends only on finite realities, so that a believer of today would have to give up the truth of his faith, and assume a “pure faith”, which is introduced as credo quia absurdum, since reason is itself atheist. I answer those statements with Lullian arguments : firstly, the unity of knowledge and will that explains the relationship of faith and reason in Llull’s work Disputatio fidei et intellectus ; and secondly, Llull’s active conception of being, which shows another perspective on the problem of evil and the human free will.