Comparison of Work Relative Value Units for Outpatient Pediatric and Adult Dermatology Encounters

• Autores: Krittin J. Supapannachart, Zachary Wolner, Allison E. Miller, Jeanette R. Comstock, Mengyu Di, Leslie P. Lawley, Beth A. Drolet, Lauren A.V. Orenstein
• Localización: JAMA Dermatology, ISSN 2168-6068, Vol. 158, Nº. 11, 2022, págs. 1300-1303
• Idioma: inglés
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Importance Dermatologists with specialty training in pediatric dermatology are scarce, which can mean extended wait times and reduced access to care for patients. Lower compensation for pediatric dermatology visits compared with adult visits may affect physician career choice and contribute to workforce shortages.

    Objective To evaluate differences in work relative value units (wRVUs) generated by pediatric and adult outpatient dermatology encounters.

    Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from outpatient dermatology encounters at a single-site academic center in Atlanta, Georgia, from September 1, 2016, to March 31, 2020. Encounters with patients younger than 18 years were classified as pediatric, and encounters with those 18 years or older were classified as adult. Encounters with missing data were excluded as were those generating 0 wRVUs, inpatient visits, nursing visits, postoperative encounters, cosmetic procedures, phototherapy visits, and Mohs surgery encounters.

    Main Outcomes and Measures Work relative value units generated per encounter type were assessed through multivariable linear regression models adjusted for the potential confounder of sex.

    Results The study included 12 989 pediatric dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 7.3 [5.2] years; 7586 [58.4%] girls) and 78 057 adult dermatology encounters (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [18.9] years; 45 724 [58.6%] women). Pediatric encounters were associated with 0.23 (95% CI, 0.21-0.25; P < .001) fewer wRVUs than adult encounters after adjusting for sex. In a mediation analysis, biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions explained 74.1% (95% CI, 69.6%-77.9%; P < .001) of the wRVU difference between pediatric and adult encounters.

    Conclusions and Relevance This cross-sectional study found significant differences in wRVUs generated between adult and pediatric dermatology encounters that were largely attributable to biopsies and destruction of premalignant lesions. Policies that increase the value of cognitive services to be on par with procedural care may mitigate wRVU differences and improve reimbursement for pediatric dermatologists.