Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


When Ellipsis Can Save Defectiveness and When It Can’t

  • Autores: Gesoel Mendes, Andrew Nevins
  • Localización: Linguistic inquiry, ISSN 0024-3892, Vol. 54, Nº 1, 2023, págs. 182-196
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • We discuss cases of salvation and non-salvation by deletion in the domain of lexical gaps, and distinguish two types of defectiveness: (a) defectiveness that can be saved by PF deletion, which we take to signal the lack of an eligible allomorph for certain environments within a language, and (b) defectiveness that cannot be saved by PF deletion, which we take to signal the lack of a proper alloseme for a given environment. With ellipsis modeled as an instruction for nonpronunciation on the PF branch of the grammar, only gaps on the Exponent List can be saved by it.


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno