John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice has often been held to be a work that is founded on an individualistic conception of the person. Communitarian criticisms directed to Rawls’ book share this approach. This article will argue that Rawls is by no means an individualist and that his conception of desert and legitimate expectations shows this in a sufficiently clear way.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados