Resumen de Il gioco senza fine: Henologia ed epistemologia nel "Sofista" e nel "Parmenide" di Platone
The aim of the article consists in an analysis of the relations between Plato’ Sophist and Parmenides. Specifically, the problem about difference and alterity is discussed focusing on the κοινωνία τῶν γενῶν and the aporias emerged in Theaetetus and Sophist (the essence of science, the method of philosophy, the impossibility of a positive definition of things, the nexus between language, thinking and reality, the distinction between the absolute and the relative sense of not-being). The link to Parmenides offers a protological lecture of Plato’s philosophy. Sophist is a sceptical- ironic exercise: the aporias of this dialogue conduce, in the first part of Parmenides, to the critic of the theory of forms and, in the second part, to the discussion about the relations between the One and the Many (the Others). The newness of the article is the division in four hypothesis of the dialogue and the interpretation of them according to a linguistic and protological point of view.
