It has become trendy to describe Judaean literature as ‘resisting empire’. This essay challenges this trope with three theses: 1) local elite cultural production can be understood as one mechanism for interacting with imperialism in a way that is acceptable for both parties, emphasising elite agency in the production of legitimacy; 2) the Teispid and early Achaemenid kings had a policy of encouraging elite cultural production in service to the empire; 3) two Hebrew texts, Second Isaiah and First Zechariah, can be understood as local Judaean elite reflexes of these phenomena: the former shapes the cult of YHWH into something suitable for imperial service; the latter sees Darius as beneficial for a reconstructed temple and a new elite in Jerusalem, while both approve of social changes effected by the new political context. Therefore, at least some ancient Judaean elites supported the Persian Empire.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados