Comparison of the effects of tissue processing on the physicochemical properties of bone allografts
- Autores: Elnaz Ajami, Cong Fu, Sun Jin Park, Xuesong Wang, Hai Bo Wen
- Localización: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, ISSN-e 0882-2786, Vol. 38, Nº. 1, 2023, págs. 169-180
- Idioma: inglés
- Enlaces
-
Resumen
Purpose: To address the hypothesis that the tissue processing methods of solvent dehydration and freeze-drying would differentially affect the physicochemical characteristics of four commercially available bone allografts and the adhesion and differentiation of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs) on such substrates in vitro.
Materials and Methods: The surface morphology, surface area, and elemental composition of four commercially available cancellous bone allografts were examined using SEM, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) gas adsorption, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analyses. SEM was also employed to compare the allograft surfaces to that of human bone exposed by in vitro osteoclastic resorption. The allografts were seeded with hBMSCs, and the number of adhered cells was assessed at 3 and 7 days. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was quantified as a measure of osteogenic differentiation after 21 days.
Results: Marked differences were seen between the physicochemical characteristics of the solvent-dehydrated and freezedried allografts, as well as between their resulting bone microarchitectures and that of osteoclast-resorbed human bone. Increased hBMSC adhesion and differentiation were observed on the solvent-dehydrated allografts compared to freezedried allografts, which suggests a higher putative osteogenic potential. The latter was attributed to better preservation of the bone collagen microarchitecture integrity, which may provide not only a more complex substrate architecture, but also a more favorable microenvironment to allow nutrients and oxygen to flow to the adhered cells.
Conclusion: Commercially available cancellous bone allografts significantly differ in their physicochemical characteristics, stemming from differences in tissue processing and sterilization methods undertaken by tissue banks. These differences impact the response of MSCs in vitro and may alter the biologic performance of the grafts in vivo. Therefore, it is important to consider these characteristics when choosing a bone substitute for clinical application, as the physicochemical properties of the grafts play a crucial role in their interactions with the biologic environment and subsequent incorporation into the native bone.
