The essay examines the powers of the Public Prosecutor and the President of the Court in the so called “family assisted negotiation” (article 6, decree 132/2014), with particular reference to the role of the spouses' will in the overall procedure and to the deflationary needs as well as to the procedural economy that are emphasized in the phases that take place before both magistrates. It also addresses the problem of the lawmaker's failure to foresee the right to listen the minor by the Public Prosecutor and the President of the Court, pointing out, among other things, the contrast between this omission and the indications coming from various supranational sources and proposing some solutions to overcome it.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados