In this paper I will discuss three passages in Calpurnius Siculusʼ first Eclogue whose text is disputed: In Calp. ecl. 1,35 Jan van Vlietʼs conjecture fatis has nearly erased the transmitted fagis from both editorsʼ and interpretersʼ memory, in 1,57 a simple scribeʼs error has led to otherwise unsubstantiable guesses about a substantive *discordium, and in 1,76 the splitted transmission which has both fervit and servit can be decided in favour of the latter by a closer look at the context.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados