Resumen de Evaluation of implant location on fiber-reinforced maxillary overdentures with finite element method
Elifnur S. Güzelce, Emre Tokar, Ozgul Karacaer
Purpose: To examine and compare stress values of implants, highest tensile and compressive values, and their distribution in cortical and trabecular bone near and around the implant region using different materials (aramid fiber, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber, carbon fiber, and cobalt-chromium [Co-Cr] alloy). Four dental implants were placed in the maxillary crest with two different location scenarios, and the 3D finite element analysis method was used to evaluate stress characteristics.
Materials and Methods: Two maxillary models were created in which the implants were placed in different locations (lateral and first premolar, canine and second premolar). Four implant-supported overdenture prostheses were reinforced, applying Co-Cr alloy, glass fiber, aramid fiber, and carbon fiber. Static loads of 200 N were applied on the first molar region using the food stuff method. Stresses around the implants and denture-bearing areas and compression and tensile stresses on the cortical and trabecular bone were evaluated.
Results: In all tested models, the highest von Mises stresses on implants and prostheses were observed in aramid fiber–reinforced overdentures. This was followed by glass fiber, Co-Cr alloy, and carbon fiber groups, respectively. It was observed that the lowest tensile and highest compression stress values in cortical and trabecular bone occurred in prostheses supported with carbon fiber. In all infrastructure materials, the design in which the implants were placed bilaterally in the lateral teeth and the first premolar region was found to be advantageous in terms of stress levels and distribution.
Conclusion: High elastic modulus fiber–reinforced overdenture prostheses transmitted less stress to implants and surrounding tissues than Co-Cr alloy. Anteriorly placed implant design illustrated lower stress values in the prosthesis, implant, and cortical and trabecular bone, and this placement design may increase the survival rates of both dental implants and overdentures. In light of this study, fibers can be recommended for clinical use and securely applied as an alternative material to metal support.
