Critics have long puzzled over the unexampled popular success of Thomas Paine's Common Sense and the corresponding failure of its most important reply, William Smith's Cato letters. In an attempt to account for this disparity, the author 1) explores how the interplay among goals, personal circumstances, means of argument, and style influenced the persuasive strategies of William Smith and Thomas Paine, and 2) describes the character‐revealing images the rhetoric of Common Sense and the Cato letters probably projected of their authors.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados