Sustainable land use: Policy implications of systematic land regularization in Mozambique

• Carrilho, João ^[1] ; Dgedge, Gustavo ^[2] ; Santos, Pedro Manuel Pinto dos ^[3] ; Trindade, Jorge ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade Aberta

     Universidade Aberta

     Socorro, Portugal

     
  2. [2] Pedagogical University

     Pedagogical University

     Mozambique

     
  3. [3] Universidade de Lisboa

     Universidade de Lisboa

     Socorro, Portugal

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 138, 2024
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Security of land tenure is key to achieve the sustainable development goal of eradicating poverty and can be improved through the regularization of rights to land, property, and natural resources. Making cities and human settlements sustainable, requires participatory and integrated land use planning, accounting for the land’s potential and constraints, with a view to medium and long-term use. The government of Mozambique is actively promoting a process of massive regularization, under common terms of reference for service providers. The terms of reference also intend to achieve a linkage between regularization and community land use plans. The aim of this research is to assess the robustness of such plans to detect and overcome potential conflicts between the given and the potential land use, as well as constraints, weaknesses and threats. This research uses a mixed documental analysis to undertake an ex-ante assessment of 15 participatory community land use plans. Five categories are assumed as a reference of good practices in land use planning suggested by universal and African literature. It was found that the common terms of reference and guidelines promote participatory capacity and provides general directions of community development. However, good practices of land use planning such as effective participation in all phases, alternative scenarios for future land use, regional integration, and disasters risk management are less promoted. It is suggested that the guidelines go beyond the immediate needs of land register, to consider that such interventions in rural areas shape the culture of land use, which, in turn, will influence sustainability in higher level settlements.