Analysis for multiple responses in a completely randomized experimental design

• Gloria Selene Herrera-Reyes ^[1] ; Miguel Ángel Martínez-Reyes ^[1] ; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez ^[1] ; Juan Manuel Romero-Padilla ^[1] ; Ignacio Luna-Espinoza ^[1] ; Javier Suárez-Espinosa ^[1]
  1. [1] Colegio de Postgraduados

     Colegio de Postgraduados

     México

     
• Localización: Agrociencia, ISSN 2521-9766, ISSN-e 1405-3195, Vol. 58, Nº. 2, 2024, págs. 151-164
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Ejemplar
• Resumen

  • Multiple responses are often generated in agricultural and forestry research. For example, the moisture content, fatty acids, carbohydrates, size, diameter, length, shape, and hardness, among other characteristics, are measured in cottonseeds. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) can be useful for multiple response analysis when differences in treatment effects are to be determined. However, the performance of current post hoc tests in this context is not satisfactory due to the limitations of the available methods or because they are difficult to use for non-statistician researchers. Furthermore, this methodology requires the assumptions of multivariate normality and homogeneity of variance and covariance matrices, assumptions that are difficult to verify if the sample size is small. This research proposes an alternative analysis to test the hypothesis of equality of effects between treatments and post hoc tests in the case of multiple responses. An asymptotic result is demonstrated for the random variable generated in the proposal for the case of uncorrelated normal variables, and the case for correlated normal random variables is left open. A simulation study shows that the performance of the proposal with small samples is satisfactory in terms of power and that it has advantages compared to MANOVA. Furthermore, the methodological approach allows for post hoc testing in the case of multiple responses in the completely randomized experimental design