Desarrollo y validación de encuesta de percepción del portafolio en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado

• ARNOLDO RIQUELME ^[1] ; BENJAMÍN MÉNDEZ ^[2] ; PALOMA DE LA FUENTE ^[2] ; OSLANDO PADILLA ^[1] ; CARLA BENAGLIO ^[3] ; MARISOL SIRHAN ^[1] ; JAIME LABARCA ^[1]
  1. [1] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

     Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

     Santiago, Chile

     
  2. [2] Universidad de Chile

     Universidad de Chile

     Santiago, Chile

     
  3. [3] Universidad del Desarrollo

     Universidad del Desarrollo

     Santiago, Chile

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Revista Médica de Chile, ISSN-e 0034-9887, Vol. 139, Nº. 1, 2011, págs. 45-53
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Development and validation of a questionnaire on perception of portfolio by undergraduate medical students
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Background: Portfolio is an innovative instrument that promotes reflection, creativity and professionalism among students. Aitn: To describe the development and validation process of a questionnaire to evalúate the use of portfolio in undergraduate medical students. Material andMethods: Focus groups with students and teachers were employed to identify aspects related with portfolio in undergraduate teaching. The Delphi technique was used to prioritize relevant aspects and construct the questionnaire. The validated questionnaire, consistingin 43 Ítems and 6factors, was appliedto 97students (response rote of99.9%) in2007and 100students (99.2%) in 2008. Each question had to be answered using a Likert scale,from 0 (completely disagree) to 4 (completely agree) The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated. Results: The questionnaire showed a high reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.9). The mean total scores obtained in 2007 and 2008 were 106.2 ± 21.2 (61.7% ofthe maximal obtainable score) and 104.6 ± 34.0 (60.8% ofthe maximal obtainable score), respectively No significant differences were seen in the analysis by factors. Changes in portfolio during 2008 showed differences in Ítems related with organization, evaluation and regulation. Conclusions: The questionnaire is a valid and highly reliable instrument, measuringperceptions about the portfolio by undergraduate medical students. The students perceived an improvement in their creativity and professionalism as one ofthe strengths of portfolio. The weaknesses identified during the implementation process helped us to focus changes in organization and evaluation to improve the portfolio as a dynamic process.