Understanding land take by low-density residential areas: An institutionalist perspective on local planning authorities, developers and households

• Eichhorn, Sebastian ^[1] ; Ehrhardt, Denise ^[2] ; Münter, Angelika ^[1] ; Behnisch, Martin ^[2] ; Jehling, Mathias ^[2]
  1. [1] Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development

     Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development

     Kreisfreie Stadt Dortmund, Alemania

     
  2. [2] Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development

     Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development

     Kreisfreie Stadt Dresden, Alemania

     
• Localización: Land use policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use, ISSN 0264-8377, ISSN-e 1873-5754, Nº. 143, 2024
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Using a case study design, the study focuses on identifying the institutional configuration that determines land take by low-density residential areas. Methodologically, it combines geospatial approaches and new institutionalism to capture and understand residential development, taking into account the interests, constraints and agency of local planning authorities, developers and households. The geospatial analysis shows that land take in the case study regions is primarily the result of low-density residential areas. We find that the combination of rural housing ideals, municipal policy objectives, municipalities' disengagement from spatial development and private sector interests are the main drivers for this kind of residential development. As the interests and constraints apply to all case study regions, the identified institutional configuration has high power in explaining low-density residential development. Our study thus uncovers a close link between the interests and constraints of actors, which on the one hand explains the limited impact of existing and new planning instruments on reducing land take, and on the other hand fosters path dependency in the development of low-density residential areas. Although there is some potential for change, breaking path dependency requires significant behavioural change among local planning authorities, developers and households.