Survival analysis of dental implants placed in a private practice. A multicenter prospective cohort study

• Frederick Li ^[3] ; Marija Roguljić ^[1] ; Ivana Medvedec-Mikić ^[1] ; Mª Ángeles Sánchez-Garcés ^[2] ; Jorge Toledano-Serrabona ^[2] ; Octavi Camps-Font ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Split

     University of Split

     Croacia

     
  2. [2] Universitat de Barcelona

     Universitat de Barcelona

     Barcelona, España

     
  3. [3] Private Dental Clinic, Vancouver, Canada

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, ISSN-e 1989-5488, Vol. 16, Nº. 5 (May), 2024, págs. 556-561
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the predictability and survival rates of dental implant treatment in edentulous patients while identifying potential factors contributing to implant failure.

    A total of 80 outpatients, receiving 166 dental implants between September 2015 and November 2017 in two private dental clinics, were included in this study. Patient and implant characteristics, surgical procedures, primary stability, prosthetic rehabilitation, failure analysis, and survival rates were analyzed.

    The majority of patients (53.75%) received a single implant for treating single-gap edentulism, with 6.25% requiring implants for fully edentulous jaws. Most implants (66.87%) were Avinent Ocean IC implants with specific design features. Surgical placement primarily occurred in healed pristine bone (78.31%), immediate implants in fresh extraction sockets (19.88%), and bone regeneration was simultaneous in 15.66% of cases. While 54.82% of implants achieved primary stability over 35Ncm, none exceeded 45Ncm, and only 4.82% failed to attain primary stability. Prosthetic rehabilitation revealed that 13.25% received immediate loading prostheses. During follow-up, four implants failed, resulting in a 2.41% failure rate, with bruxism (HR: 96.62; P< 0.001) and absence of primary stability (HR: 23.54; P< 0.001) significantly associated with implant failure. The cumulative survival rate at 24 months was 97.44%.

    This study demonstrates the high predictability and survival rates of dental implant treatment in edentulous patients, consistent with established standards. Factors such as bruxism and primary stability may impact early implant failure. Dental implants remain a reliable treatment option, boasting a 97.44% cumulative survival rate at 24 months. Further research is required to explore implant failure indicators and multifactorial influences.