S. Kripke has motivated and modelled a truth-value gap solution to the Liar paradox. Setting forth the classical Tarskian account in a simple and elegant self-referential language, we will obtain some classical Tarskian results. We then modify the self-referential language successively to model the truth-value gap solutions mentioned above. These solutions depend on the semantic notion of groundedness. We argue against these truth-value gap solutions by giving informal semantical counterexamples and reproducing revenge problems for each that are more troublesome than the usual Strengthened Liar.
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados