Dynamic behavior of different kinds of rack vehicles

• Zhaowei Chen ^[1] ; Miao Yuan ^[1] ; Shihui Li ^[1] ; Zhihui Chen ^[2] ; Jizhong Yang ^[2]
  1. [1] Chongqing Jiaotong University

     Chongqing Jiaotong University

     China

     
  2. [2] Science and Technology Research Institute, China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd, Chengdu, China
• Localización: Mechanics based design of structures and machines, ISSN 1539-7734, Vol. 52, Nº. 12, 2024, págs. 10663-10681
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • For the sake of improving climbing ability of railway vehicle, gear-rack system is added to traditional vehicle to form rack vehicle. Aiming at the influence of the different gear-rack systems on the rack vehicle dynamic behavior, this article considers the gear-rack meshing impact based on the analysis of the generation mechanism of the gear-rack meshing excitation. The gear-rack meshing model and four kinds of rack vehicle coupled dynamics models are established, and the model is verified by experiments. Based on the model, the gear-rack nonlinear meshing behavior and rack vehicle dynamics characteristic of two kinds of Strub system, double row teeth Abt system and Locher system under different slopes is explored. and the dynamic characters of the rack vehicle system is analyzed. Finally, the optimal gear-rack system is obtained by comparing the dynamic behavior of different vehicles. The results show that: The dynamic behavior of rack vehicles with different gear-rack systems is significantly different, and Locher system has the optimal dynamic behavior. The gear-rack nonlinear meshing behavior and the vehicle safety of the coaxial Strub system and the double row teeth Abt system are poor, which are obviously affected by the track irregularity. The impact of the gear-rack nonlinear contact force of the coaxial Strub system reaches 29.8 kN. The maximum wheel/rail vertical force of the double row teeth Abt system reaches 51.4 kN. The vehicle stability of the different shaft Strub system is the worst, and the maximum stability index is 1.368. The conclusion of this paper provides theoretical support for the design and safe operation and maintenance of the world’s mountainous rack railway.