Ayuda
Ir al contenido

Dialnet


How the Field was Colonized: Russian History’s Ukrainian Blind Spot

    1. [1] City University of New York

      City University of New York

      Estados Unidos

    2. [2] Wright State University

      Wright State University

      City of Dayton, Estados Unidos

  • Localización: Russian History, ISSN 0094-288X, Vol. 50, Nº. Extra 3-4, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Forum: Reinterpreting Russian History After February 24, 2022, edited by Oleksa Drachewych), págs. 145-156
  • Idioma: inglés
  • Enlaces
  • Resumen
    • This discussion seeks to trace the origins of a particularly sympathetic approach to the Russian state and its needs with the field of Russian history in the United States. The response notes some of the major scholars who have greatly influenced the study of Russian history. These include Michael Karpovich, Richard Pipes, and Edward Keenan among others. The discussion grapples with the question of how Russian history in the US has or has not included Ukraine in its narrative and the terms of that incorporation. The original exchange, on H-Russia, comprised the first two commentaries. Susan Smith-Peter’s response was not part of the original H-Russia post. Sean Pollock was not invited to respond


Fundación Dialnet

Dialnet Plus

  • Más información sobre Dialnet Plus

Opciones de compartir

Opciones de entorno