Operative criticism and historical criticism in Manfredo Tafuri

• Jorge Nunes ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidade de Lisboa

     Universidade de Lisboa

     Socorro, Portugal

     
• Localización: Tradition and Innovation / Mário Say Ming Kong (aut.), Aleksander Józef Olszewski (aut.), Martin Simonson (aut.), Andreia Garcia (aut.), Jorge Nunes (aut.), José Lopes Morgado (aut.), Santi Centineo (aut.), Andrea Iezzi (aut.), Irina Seits (aut.), Taisia S. Paniotova (aut.), Maxim Romanenko (aut.), Valdomiro Ceolin (aut.), Francisco Oliveira (aut.), Margarida Louro (aut.), Carla Chiarantoni (aut.), António Leite (aut.), Denise Gaudiot (aut.), João Pernão (aut.), Laura Martins (aut.), Andre Santos (aut.), Catarina Rosa e Silva de Albuquerque (aut.), Jéssica Costa (aut.), Ljiljana Čavić (aut.), Leonardo Barros (aut.), Maria Luisa Trindade Bestetti (aut.), Mariana Alves da Silva do Nascimento (aut.), Maria Madalena Aguiar da Cunha Matos (aut.), Maria da Luz Sampaio (aut.), Clara Vale (aut.), João B. Menezes de Sequeira (aut.), Artur Renato Ortega (aut.), Silvana Weihermann (aut.), Eduardo Francisco Durao Antunes (aut.), Pedro Miguel Gomes Januario (aut.), Paulo Jorge Garcia Pereira (aut.), Verner Monteiro (aut.), Maísa Veloso (aut.), Bárbara Silva (aut.), Mário Bruno Cruz (aut.), Clara Germana Gonçalves (aut.), Maria João Moreira Soares (aut.), Joao Miguel Couto Duarte (aut.), Raffaella Maddaluno (aut.), João Silva Jordão (aut.), María da Soledade Gómez Paiva de Sousa (aut.), Miguel Baptista Bastos (aut.), Alex Nogueira Rezende (aut.), José Vitor Correia (aut.), Ana Vasconcelos (aut.), José Cabral Dias (aut.), Eneida Kuchpil (aut.), Kate O’Connor (aut.), Sandra da Mouta Brito (aut.), Madalena Pinto Da Silva (aut.), Helena Paula Abreu de Carvalho (aut.), Marta Labastida (aut.), Maria Eunice da Costa Salavessa (aut.), José Tadeu Marques Aranha (aut.), Viviana Sofia Hipólito Frutuoso (aut.), Amilcar de Gil Pires (aut.), Wenyu Qi (aut.), João Guerreirinho (aut.), Hirbod Norouzianpour (aut.), David Weiss (aut.), Calogero Montalbano (aut.), José Silveira Dias (aut.), Fernando Moreira da Silva (aut.), Ana Moreira da Silva (aut.), Caio Marcelo Miolo de Oliveira (aut.), Rita Almendra (aut.), Ana Rita Lourenço (aut.), Tiago Perez Leitão Maciel (aut.), António Gorgel Pinto (aut.), Alberto Cruz Reaes Pinto (aut.), Gizela Horvath (aut.), Maria João Castro (aut.), António Canau (aut.), Szymon Wróbel (aut.), Isabel Gomes de Almeida (aut.), Guilherme Borges Pires (aut.), Kim Groop (aut.), María do Rosário Pimentel (aut.), Rodolfo Nogueira da Cruz (aut.), Maria Leonor García da Cruz (aut.), Olinda Kleiman (aut.), Ana Paula Avelar (aut.), Fernando Jorge Oliveira Ribeiro (aut.), Mário Carlos Fernandes Avelar (aut.), Angélica Varandas (aut.), Maria de la Salette da Costa Loureiro (aut.), Margarida Rendeiro (aut.), Raúl Montero Gilete (aut.), Eduardo M. Raposo (aut.), Gonçalo Falcão (aut.), Paulo Simões (aut.), Ana Cristina dos Santos Guerreiro (aut.), Maria da Graça dos Santos Antunes Moreira (aut.), Ana Pereira Neto (aut.), Ana Isabel Runa (aut.), Iuliana Borbely (aut.), Ermanno Aparo (aut.), Liliana Soares (aut.), Paula Maria Vieira Reaes Pinto (aut.), 2021, ISBN 9780429297786
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto Completo Libro
• Resumen

  • The work of the Italian historian Manfredo Tafuri in the context of the history and criticism of modern architecture is vast, standing out, above all, for the radicalism with which it approaches the current cycle whose first systematization emerges with the publication of Teorie e Storia dell’Architettura in 1968. This book introduces issues that will become central in the following years, such as the revision of the Modern Movement and the relationship between ideology and architecture, within which the problematic relationship between history and criticism becomes relevant. The opposition to the “operative” criticism and the deficiencies pointed out to the “historian architects” committed to the causes of architecture are scrutinized in this work and refer to a famous polemic that began years earlier regarding an exhibition dedicated to the work of Michelangelo. Tafuri accused Bruno Zevi and Paolo Portoguesi, commissioners of the show, of practicing “militant criticism” and distorting history, framing, and shaping it to conform to their professional agendas. To avoid this type of conflict of interest, he proposes the abandonment of historical research by architects related to the professional practice and defends history as a critical instrument. Today, when the notion of “objective reality” underlying Teorie e Storia can no longer be sustained before the theoretical precepts of post-structuralism, as Tafuri himself came to recognize later, but the value of reliable information is discussed again, this article revisits the Italian historian’s warnings of the dangers of “operative” criticism that led him to review methods and practices of traditional historiography, still dominant in the second half of the 1960s, exerting a profound influence on the architectural debates that occurred in the following decade in Europe and the United States.