The European Commission Recommendation on Collective Redress (2013/396/EU) establishes a framework to ensure a coherent horizontal approach to collective litigation in the EU context without harmonising national systems. The Commission clearly aims at distinguishing collective redress in Europe from the North American class action approach.
This book explores the need for mass litigation mechanisms in Europe from a series of interdisciplinary perspectives (law and economics, behavioural sciences, and sociological and judicial perspectives). It also analyses the current collective redress landscape in Europe in light of the Commission Recommendation; this includes an assessment of national collective redress mechanisms; views from oversees on the present and future of collective litigation in Europe; commentary on various specific areas of collective redress including competition law, product liability and consumer protection; and the options for and relevance of collective ADR mechanisms.
The book is a useful tool for practitioners and academics with an interest in collective redress in Europe and overseas.
Dr Eva Lein, Dr Duncan Fairgrieve, Dr Marta Otero Crespo and Vincent Smith led the 'Focus on Collective Redress' project at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, funded for two years by the European Commission. It consisted of various events, research resulting in a comprehensive website on European Collective Redress (www.collectiveredress.org) and this publication, based on contributions by a network of academics and practitioners involved in the project.
págs. 5-30
The economics of class actions: fundamental issues and new trends
págs. 31-44
págs. 47-57
To "opt-in" or to "opt-out": that is the question
págs. 61-65
págs. 67-80
págs. 83-92
Recent United Kingdom and French reforms of class actions: an unfinished journey
págs. 97-115
Class actions: some reflections from a european perpective
págs. 117-132
Rebuilding the pillars of collective litigation in light of the Commission recommendation: the spanish approach to collective redress
págs. 133-151
Recent collective redress developments in Lithuania: key issues in light of the implementation of the Commission recommendation
págs. 153-168
págs. 169-201
Cross-border actions for collective redress: some lessons from Canada
págs. 203-218
The Commission recommendation on common principles for collective redress: some reflections from Australia
págs. 219-233
págs. 235-249
Forum shopping and consumer collective redress in action: the Costa Concordia case
págs. 251-272
The israeli class action: a foundation for a european model?
págs. 273-291
Collective redress and product liability in the European Union: the outcome of a legal transplant in Italy
págs. 295-326
Collective redress in environmental liability cases: the spanish approach
págs. 327-336
Collective redress and competition law claims: some specific issues
págs. 337-355
Where to next?: The European Law Institute's statement on collective redress and competition damages claims
págs. 357-384
Collective redress and health care laws: the specific characteristics of group compensation under portuguese law
págs. 385-396
págs. 399-421
págs. 423-442
págs. 443-454
Finnish and swedish legislation in light of the ADR directive: boards and ombudsmen
págs. 455-478
págs. 481-503
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados