Deconstructing canine demodicosis
- Autores: Iván Ravera
- Directores de la Tesis: Lluís Ferrer i Caubet (dir. tes.), Laia Solano Gallego (codir. tes.), Mar Bardagí i Admetlla (codir. tes.)
- Lectura: En la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ( España ) en 2015
- Idioma: inglés
- Tribunal Calificador de la Tesis: María Teresa Verde Arribas (presid.), Guadalupe Miró Corrales (secret.), Veronica Lucia Martínez Díaz (voc.)
- Materias:
- Enlaces
- Resumen
It is considered that Demodex mites are normal inhabitants of the mammalian skin. They have been adapted to live inside skin hair follicles and sebaceous glands of mammalian hosts. Demodicosis can be defined as an inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of Demodex mite overpopulation. It is considered that the cellular immune response is responsible for the control of mite population, while the role of the humoral and innate immune responses remains unknown. In domestic animals, the most severe form of demodicosis occurs in dogs. Consequently, canine demodicosis is the most studied disease produced by Demodex mites. Two canine Demodex species have been identified: Demodex canis, and Demodex injai, while a third species unofficially named Demodex cornei, has been proposed. Many studies have tried to report Demodex prevalence in healthy dogs by different methods.
In the present doctoral thesis, we described a real-time PCR technique to detect Demodex DNA (sequence of chitin synthase gene) in canine hair samples. This technique demonstrated the presence of Demodex mites in higher percentages than previous reports, suggesting that Demodex mites are present in all healthy dogs independent of age, sex, breed, or coat.
Furthermore, Demodex populations were distributed in small numbers along the dog¿s body.
In order to analyze the phylogenetic relationships between the two canine Demodex species and the proposed third species, we amplified and sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that D. injai is a different species from D. canis. In addition, it demonstrated that D. cornei is probably a morphological variant of D. canis. A conventional PCR for the specific detection of D. injai DNA was also developed and standardized. This technique demonstrated that D. injai is also a normal inhabitant of some dogs. Moreover, it suggested that in the majority of clinical canine demodicosis cases, an overgrowth of D. injai is unlikely.
Finally, to enlighten the field of the humoral response in canine demodicosis, a D. canis crude extract antigen was obtained and we demonstrated the presence of immunoglobulins G against several D. canis antigens in the sera of healthy dogs and in the sera of dogs with juvenile generalized demodicosis with and without secondary complicating pyoderma by western blot technique.
In conclusion, this doctoral thesis demonstrated that Demodex mites are normal inhabitant of the canine skin, they are present in the majority of dogs, and are distributed in very low numbers along all the haired skin. Furthermore, Demodex injai must be considered a different species from D. canis, and D.
cornei is a probable morphological variant of D. canis. Healthy dogs and dogs with canine juvenile generalized demodicosis have an acquired humoral immune response against Demodex mites and present serum antibodies directed against several Demodex canis protein antigens.
