This dissertation studies the inferential articulation of speech acts (in particular, assertions and questions) in dialogue, drawing upon two theoretical frameworks, a normative Question Under Discussion (qud) model of discourse and a type-theoretical framework for semantics. It is demonstrated that under a normative inferentialist view of speech acts, the potential of reacting to a speech act can be characterized in terms of the existence of a proper question that bridges the two concerned speech acts, and furthermore, that the rhetorical relation that emerges from this one-turn dialogical interaction can be reduced to a family of qud-relations (i.e., question resolution and question implication). The analyses presented in this dissertation give rise to a more comprehensive qud-model of discourse called RiD (an acronym for ``Reasoning in Dialogue'').
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados