Cogency: Journal of reasoning and argumentation

• 

  Año 2011, Vol. 3, Número 2

  • The study of legal argumentation in argumentation theory and legal theory: approaches and developments

    Eveline T. Feteris

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 11-32

    

  • Use and abuse of intratextual argumentation in law

    Damiano Canale, Giovanni Tuzet

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 33-52

    

  • Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal norms

    Carlos Bernal Pulido

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 53-66

    

  • Towards a typology of argumentation based on legal principles

    Harm Kloosterhuis

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 67-80

    

  • Reasoning by consequences: applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions

    Flavia Carbonell Bellolio

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 81-104

    

  • Fallacies in ad Hominem arguments

    Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav, Lena Wahlberg

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 105-124

    

  • Justice, prejudice, and the basis for reasonable legal argument: the Karen Atala case

    José Julio León

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 125-145

    

  • Strategic maneuvering and appellate argumentation in Boumediene v. Bush

    Janice Schuetz

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 147-166

    

  • Judicial argumentation: law's distinction from fact

    Sebastian McEvoy

    • Resumen
    • Texto completo

    págs. 167-190