Resumen de Communicating to the Courts and Beyond: Why Members of Congress Participate as Amici Curiae
Rorie L. Spill Solberg, Eric S. Heberlig
Members of Congress engage in discretionary behaviors, such as making speeches and cosponsoring bills, which are generally motivated by either electoral needs or policy preferences. We examine a discretionary behavior that engages the judicial branch in the conversation: the participation of members of Congress as amici curiae before the Supreme Court. Amicus curiae briefs provide members of Congress with a direct avenue of communication with the judiciary, and this characteristic suggests that cosigning would be a method of creating good public policy. Using data from the 1980�97 terms of the Supreme Court, however, we find that members of Congress cosign onto amicus curiae briefs as a means of �taking stances,� akin to cosponsoring a bill. The action allows the member to speak indirectly to an audience beyond these governmental institutions. Evidence shows that ideological extremism and committee jurisdiction promote participation as amicus curiae.
