Brasil
Os meios de resolução consensual de conflitos voltam às pautas de juristas e do Judiciário enquanto métodos capazes de contribuir para a concreção da cidadania com o compromisso de divulgar uma justiça democrática que respeita a autonomia de vontade e dentro da qual não existem apenas verdades lineares positivadas, mas sim, espaços dialógicos propícios para o debate como forma a proporcionar aos cidadãos uma participação efetiva em todas as esferas do Poder Público em respeito à mais pura e efetiva democracia participativa. Palavras-chave: Resolução de Conflitos. Cidadania. Educação para Cidadania. Democracia Participativa. ABSTRACTThe consensual dispute solving, a theme that is back to the lawyers and the Judiciary’s agenda as effective methods of significant contribution to the establishment of citizenship, with the commitment to spread the democratic justice that respect their wish for autonomy and whereas there are not only positivized linear truths but also dialogical spaces all owing debates in order to should provide to its citizens an effective participation throughout all the spheres of government, in order to respect the purest and most effective participatory democracy. Thus , before the demonstration of a gap in the training of citizenship in Brazil, this study aims through the deductive method, present an empowerment proposal of citizens, aimed at concreteness of their citizenship through an increasingly effective participation in public life, so that this process begins by searching for resolving their own problems without imposing the intervention of a third party with the power to command. The central issue of this paper it is to show that the creation of dialogical spaces will generate not only the empowerment of the individual, but an awareness of the role of each within society, thus growing interest in the search for full citizenship.Keywords: Conflicts Solving. Citizenship. Education for Citizenship. Participatory Democracy
© 2001-2024 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados