The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of computer-generated aids facilitates a greater variety ofconcept embodiments compared to the classical approach. A total of 60 participants were enrolled in the DesignMethodology course. They were divided into a control group using the classical approach and an experimental group inwhich computer-generated aids were employed. The embodiments produced by the participants from both groups wereassessed for variety, independently by two experts having both academic and industrial experience in the field of productdevelopment. The experts were not informed about the groups or any of the study details. Analysis of the results of thisexperiment indicates that computer-generated aids play a supportive role in concept embodiment.
© 2001-2025 Fundación Dialnet · Todos los derechos reservados