Resumen de Un lulista responde a Paolo Flores d’Arcais
I propose an analysis of Paolo Flores d’Arcais’ work Atheism and Truth in the light of Ramon Llull’s thought. This task shows Ramon Llull as a prevailing philosopher, who can help solve many of the difficulties of the twenty-first-century thought. Paolo Flores d‘Arcais departs from a “philosophy of disenchantment” that depends only on finite realities, so that a believer of today would have to give up the truth of his faith, and assume a “pure faith”, which is introduced as credo quia absurdum, since reason is itself atheist. I answer those statements with Lullian arguments : firstly, the unity of knowledge and will that explains the relationship of faith and reason in Llull’s work Disputatio fidei et intellectus ; and secondly, Llull’s active conception of being, which shows another perspective on the problem of evil and the human free will.
