Resumen de The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review

Juan C. Vázquez, Antonio Piñero Madrona, Francisco Javier de Castro García, Ana Lluch Hernández, Miguel Martín Jiménez, Agustí Barnadas i Molins, Emilio Alba, Álvaro Rodríguez Lescure, Federico Rojo, Julia Giménez Climent, Ivan Solà Arnau, Maria Jesus Quintana, X. Bonfill, G. Urrutia Cuchi, Pedro Sánchez Rovira

• Purpose To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection.

  Methods The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate.

  Results Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11–0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86–0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used.

  Conclusions SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.